Bombay Hc Denies Bail Casting Couch Rape Leaked Videos Section 69 Bns

The Bombay High Court on June 1 rejected anticipatory bail to a man booked for allegedly raping a woman by obtaining her consent for a physical relationship on the false pretext of giving her work in a film. The court observed that granting him relief would ad... The court observed that granting him relief would “adversely affect fair and effective investigation.” A vacation bench of Justice Shyam C Chandak passed an order on the bail application by the man apprehending arrest in a case registered by Pune Police for offences punishable under Section 69 (sexual intercourse by employing deceitful means) of the BNS and provisions of IT Act, 2000. The prosecution alleged that two years ago, the complainant woman had contacted the applicant about an audition. Few days later, he promised her to find a good film story for her, and they established friendship. Later that year, he allegedly obtained her consent for a physical relationship by promising film work, and they continued relations on that promise. During this time he took objectionable photos and videos, assuring he would not make them public. The applicant did not disclose he was married and later told her that he had a minor daughter and his wife was not staying with him. When his wife came to know about his relationship, the applicant and the complainant woman decided to stop meeting and he allegedly deleted objectionable photos and videos. However, a few days later, he threatened on WhatsApp that “if she goes somewhere for romping,” he would drop the said material on social media. Later, he made the photos and videos viral. “The applicant had no reason to take the objectionable photos and videos of the woman and make them viral. Therefore, it appears that, since the beginning, the applicant had ill intention to misuse the photos/videos of the victim. Thus, the applicant misused the trust invested in him by the complainant. Said act of the applicant has ruined her life. Therefore, there is a prima facie case of the offence of rape,” Justice Chandak observed. The HC observed the applicant has “only made a show that he has deleted the subject photos/videos,” which he later made viral; therefore his “custodial interrogation was essential to collect the important electronic evidence.” Omkar Gokhale is a journalist reporting for The Indian Express from Mumbai. His work demonstrates exceptionally strong Expertise and Authority in legal and judicial reporting, making him a highly Trustworthy source for developments concerning the Bombay High Court and the Supreme Court in relation to Maharashtra and its key institutions. Expertise & Authority Affiliation: Reports for The Indian Express, a national newspaper known for its rigorous journalistic standards, lending significant Trustworthiness to his legal coverage. Core Authority & Specialization: Omkar Gokhale's work is almost exclusively dedicated to the complex field of legal affairs and jurisprudence, specializing in: Bombay High Court Coverage: He provides detailed, real-time reports on the orders, observations, and decisions of the Bombay High Court's principal and regional benches. Key subjects